AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
National unity synonym9/10/2023 ![]() In contrast to many other languages with grammatical aspect, the distinctions borne by pfv vs ipfv aspect are based on patterns of stem derivation marked by prefixes and suffixes. This does not imply that the system across Slavic languages is identical in all of its parts, but we can say that its fundamental architecture is the same for all Slavic languages. The opposition of perfective (pfv): imperfective (ipfv) aspect can be considered a ‘proprietary label’ of Slavic languages as a whole, inasmuch as in all contemporary and historically attested Slavic languages the core of their aspect system is organized in an identical manner, both concerning basic morphological patterns and basic functional distinctions. Our findings, as well as a revision of theoretical positions, support a notion of paradigm in which typical inflectional distinctions are brought into an equilibrium with functional inventories and collocational constraints. These preferences prove stable over time, distinctions in form typically associated with inflection turn out to be altogether irrelevant. The two ipfv stems show preferences for different basic functions associated with the ipfv aspect, the coding of marginal arguments and adjuncts also yields clear biases of choice. ![]() We provide their token-based analysis for the period 1750–2017. On this background, we test some core assumptions of the morphology-lexicon interface on one typical aspect triplet from Polish and Czech, the cognate ipfv Pol. However, can derivationally related stems claimed to represent identical lexical concepts be treated as representatives of one or of two paradigms? The issue becomes especially intricate with aspect triplets in which two ipfv stems correspond to one pfv stem, as though combining two productive patterns of aspect derivation. It creates a complex network of functions for finite and non-finite forms, which largely applies regardless of aspectual pairedness (and actionality groups), since this opposition has classificatory properties. The Slavic perfective (pfv): imperfective (ipfv) opposition is based on stem derivation.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |